- Use of voiceover and interviews
- Filmaker not present in any shots, no direct interaction with subject matter
- Use of a Voice of God voiceover
- Use of upbeat music- made the pace lively and kept the audience interested
- Still shots used throughout all interviews- emphasised the serious situation
- Archive footage such as news reports, newspaper headlines
- Could have used a stronger voiceover as the voice used was very weak and sounded young
Skin Deep
- Use of voiceover
- Film maker interviewed subjects from behind the character
- modern music used alongside the very modern topic of tattooing- makes it clear that this is aimed at a younger audience
- could have improved in editing as the fade outs used appeared to cut the person of to soon, whcih makes it clear they have edited bits of the interview
- Also, the voiceover at the beginning is of a strong voice whilst later in the documentary, the voice changes this can be confusing for the audience
Secret Surveillance
- use of interviews
- Film maker very involved in the documentary
- Edited the colour of the shots to make it look more like real CCTV footage
- No archive footage used
- Could have improved with sound levels as there were numerous sound jolts
- The interviews also looked very low budget as they were set in the wrong location for a crime style like program
Wikileaks
- Voiceovers
- Direct interviews with the film makers involvement
- Strong soundtrack to introduce the documentary- draws instant attention
- Heavy use of archive footage
- Interviews with important people that were very relevant to the subject matter
- However, the difference in definition from HD to standard camera in an interview makes the film maker appear to be in a different room than the interviewee
- The interviews are very long which makes the documentary appear slow
No comments:
Post a Comment